The science, with the weak parts left in
Nothing in Hum rates strong. The best evidence is moderate, and it’s about music, noise or breathing in general, not Hum’s own sound. Hum isn’t a treatment. Here are the numbers, so you can judge for yourself.
The numbers
Each line shows a pooled result and its 95% confidence interval. We’ve flipped the results where a lower score is the good outcome, so right always means the outcome you’d want. The figures on the right are as published. These are different outcomes in different people, so don’t read the rows as a ranking. None of them tested Hum.
| What was tested | WorseBetter | Published figure, 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Noise for attention, with ADHD or many ADHD traitsWhite and pink noise on lab tasks. Mostly young people. | g = 0.249 (0.135 to 0.363)13 studies, N = 335Moderate. [4] | |
| Noise for attention, without attention difficultiesSame review, comparison groups. They got worse. | g = −0.212 (−0.355 to −0.069)11 comparisons, N = 335Moderate. [4] | |
| Music and anxiety, healthy samplesSelf-reported. Physiological change wasn’t significant, and the studies vary and are often weak. | d = −0.30 (−0.55 to −0.04)Study count not in our notesModerate. [5] | |
| Natural sounds, stress and annoyanceMostly real recordings. Hum’s nature sounds are synthesised and untested. | g = −0.60 (−0.97 to −0.23)18 publicationsModerate for real recordings, none for Hum’s. [6] | |
| Breathwork, stressThe benefit is from the breathing, not from any sound. | g = −0.35 (−0.55 to −0.14)12 RCTs, N = 785Moderate for breathing, none for the sound. [7] | |
| The 16 Hz pulse in musicWoods 2024. Only a three-way interaction is reported for rate, so there’s no plain effect size to plot. | Can’t be plotted | F(1,80) = 4.03, p = 0.048Partial eta squared 0.048, N = 82Weak. [2] [3] |
| Different scale: points on a sleep questionnaire | WorseBetter | Published figure, 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Bedtime music, adults with insomniaSelf-rated sleep quality. Objective measures, from 136 participants, may not improve. | PSQI −2.79 (−3.86 to −1.72)13 RCTs, N = 1,007Moderate. [1] |
The pulse, in full
The idea comes from Woods and colleagues, 2024 [2]. In its only controlled test of rate, 82 online adults did a task for 5 minutes per condition with music pulsing at 8, 16 or 32 Hz. People who reported more ADHD traits did better over time at 16 Hz. That rests on one three-way interaction with p = 0.048. A further 93 people tested low, medium and high depth, and the paper reports no significant effects, with ratings reversing from medium to high.
The conflict. The first author is a Brain.fm employee with equity options, and another author held equity. The paper first declared no competing interests, and the journal corrected that in April 2026 [3]. The work was funded by an NSF STTR grant. We found no independent replication.
How Hum differs from that study.
- Hum modulates everything above 150 Hz. The study used 200 Hz to 1 kHz, because broadband modulation could be annoying.
- Hum’s 3.5, 7 and 12 dB can’t be mapped onto the study’s low, medium and high.
- Stronger modulation isn’t shown to be better.
- 12, 14 and 18 Hz weren’t tested on behaviour, 32 Hz wasn’t better than 16 Hz, and 40 Hz wasn’t tested.
- Participants were online adults with self-reported traits, not a clinical ADHD sample.
A 2026 scoping review of music-based digital therapeutics reached the same general view: evidence for specific products is too limited to judge real-world effect [18]. So we rate the pulse weak. For focus it starts at Off, Low or Medium depending on your answers, and everywhere else it starts off.
Noise, reading and sleep
Noise. It can help some people and hurt others [4]. The review found no studies of brown noise, and we found none of grey. The author also warned about hearing risk with headphones and unknown long-term effects in children [19].
Reading. Across 65 studies, background speech, music and noise all had a small harmful effect on comprehension (g = −0.26, −0.19 and −0.17), and lyrical music was worst (g = −0.35) [20]. Silence is a fair choice, and Hum says so.
Sleep. Calm music helps people rate their sleep better [1]. Continuous noise is less clear: one review rated the evidence very low quality [21]. In a seven-night sleep-lab study of 25 young, healthy people, pink noise at 50 dBA cut REM sleep from 118.1 to 99.5 minutes, and earplugs did better against traffic noise [16]. So Hum keeps noise on a timer at night, and suggests earplugs first.
How strong each part is
Moderate means a meta-analysis or moderate-certainty review, usually with small effects and real limits. Weak means one or a few small, indirect, conflicted or contradictory studies. None means we found no human behavioural study of this specific thing.
| What | Strength | What Hum does |
|---|---|---|
| A 16 Hz pulse, for people reporting attention trouble | Weak | Low or Medium, depending on your task and how often you say you lose focus |
| Noise, with ADHD or many ADHD traits | Moderate for noise alone, none combined with the pulse | A little pink noise, unless you’re reading or studying, or want less sound |
| Noise, without attention difficulties | Moderate, and it’s a small harm | Off |
| Keeping sound low and wordless for hard or reading tasks | Moderate | Music lower in the mix, sparse tracks |
| Bedtime music for 25 to 60 minutes | Moderate, on self-rated sleep | 45 minutes, then a 15-minute fade |
| Continuous noise all night | Weak, with a caution | Earplugs suggested first, and always on a timer |
| Music for stress | Moderate | Pulse off, music you pick |
| Slow breathing | Moderate for breathing, none for the sound | A swell at about 5.5 a minute to follow |
| The pulse for relaxing, meditating or sleep | None | Off |
| Binaural beats and isochronic tones | Weak for binaural, none to weak for isochronic | Off, manual only |
| 40 Hz, Schumann, Solfeggio | None | Off, manual only, no claim |
What we’d never claim
- That Hum treats or diagnoses anything
It plays music. It doesn’t tell anyone they have ADHD, and one survey question couldn’t.
- That Hum improves focus or sleep
No trial has tested Hum’s own sound. After a change the app says you rated it higher, never that it works better for you.
- That a stronger pulse is better
The depth experiment found no significant effects, and going from medium to high reversed the ratings [2]. High is manual only.
- That Hum entrains your brain, or that bands do jobs
Beta for focus and theta for meditation imply benefits nobody has shown. Hum’s rates of 1.5 to 11 Hz have no behavioural evidence.
- That binaural beats help attention
A direct test at 16 Hz found evidence against a benefit [8]. Entrainment looks weak, and the reviews conflict [9] [10].
- That isochronic tones do anything
The only controlled trial we found showed no difference in anxiety [11].
- That 40 Hz helps focus
We found no behavioural study of 40 Hz modulated music. 32 Hz wasn’t better than 16 Hz [2]. The Alzheimer’s work used light and sound, in patients [12].
- That Schumann or Solfeggio tones help
Schumann resonance is electromagnetic, and the one insomnia trial used a device, not sound [13]. The Solfeggio studies retuned music rather than playing steady tones, and showed no behavioural benefit [14].
- That pink noise improves deep sleep
That work times short sounds to sleep stages [15], and Hum can’t detect sleep stages. In a sleep lab, all-night pink noise cut dream sleep [16].
- That your ratings measure performance
They show what felt good. Feeling and performance separate often [1] [17].
What your ratings can and can’t show
A rating answers “did this feel good to you”, not “did this improve your focus”. Unusually low ratings also tend to rise on their own [22], which makes any change look like it worked. So Hum compares two setups by alternating them, over 8 rated sessions each, and keeps the new one only if it wins by 0.75 points or more.
That’s a blunt tool, and here’s how blunt. In a simulation, this rule acts on 6% of comparisons with no real difference, 28% with a real gap of half a point, and 63% with a gap of a full point. Those figures assume ratings vary by 1 point within a person, which is our assumption and not something we’ve measured. Hum can catch big differences and will rarely catch small ones.
Listening safely
Keep the volume comfortable: WHO suggests no more than 60% of your device’s maximum [23]. Hum doesn’t know how loud your device is, so it can’t promise a safe level. At night, use the lowest level you can still hear, on a speaker rather than headphones. If you have epilepsy or sound-triggered seizures, ask your doctor first. Using Hum for a child calls for lower volume, with no noise layer at bedtime [24].
Nothing on this site or in the app flashes or moves with the pulse. 16 Hz is inside the range of flashing most likely to provoke photosensitive seizures [25] [26], so we keep visuals slow and unconnected to the sound.
14 days free. No card.
Sources
Numbered in the order they appear above, with how much of each we read. The app’s own suggestions draw on more papers than this page does.
- [1] Jespersen KV, Pando-Naude V, Koenig J, et al. Listening to music for insomnia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022. doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010459.pub3 Read the web page
- [2] Woods KJP, Sampaio G, James T, et al. Rapid modulation in music supports attention in listeners with attentional difficulties. Communications Biology 2024;7:1376. doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-07026-3 Read in full
- [3] Author Correction (competing interests). Communications Biology 2026;9:527. doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-10015-3 Read in full
- [4] Nigg JT, Bruton A, Kozlowski MB, Johnstone JM, Karalunas SL. Do white noise or pink noise help with task performance in youth with ADHD or with elevated attention problems? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2024;63(8):778-788. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2023.12.014 Abstract only
- [5] Panteleeva Y, Ceschi G, Glowinski D, Courvoisier DS, Grandjean D. Music for anxiety? Meta-analysis of anxiety reduction in non-clinical samples. Psychol Music 2017. doi.org/10.1177/0305735617712424 Abstract only
- [6] Buxton RT, Pearson AL, Allou C, Fristrup K, Wittemyer G. A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks. PNAS 2021. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013097118 Abstract only
- [7] Fincham GW, Strauss C, Montero-Marin J, Cavanagh K. Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health. Sci Rep 2023. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27247-y Abstract only
- [8] Robison MK, Obulasetty M, Blais C, Wingert KM, Brewer GA. The effect of binaural beat stimulation on sustained attention. Psychol Res 2022. doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01524-3 Abstract only
- [9] Orozco Perez HD, Dumas G, Lehmann A. Binaural beats through the auditory pathway. eNeuro 2020. doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0232-19.2020 Abstract only
- [10] Ingendoh RM, Posny ES, Heine A. Binaural beats to entrain the brain? A systematic review. PLoS One 2023. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286023 Abstract only
- [11] Akkurt O, Ekici Ö. Effect of binaural beats and isochronic tones on anxiety during impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2026. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2026.07.006 Abstract only
- [12] Chan D, Suk HJ, Jackson BL, et al. Gamma frequency sensory stimulation in mild probable Alzheimer's dementia patients. PLoS One 2022. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278412 Abstract only
- [13] Huang YS, Tang I, Chin WC, et al. The subjective and objective improvement of non-invasive treatment of Schumann resonance in insomnia. Nat Sci Sleep 2022. doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S346941 Abstract only
- [14] Bozok ÜG, Özcan GB, Bayraktar B, Özen D. Acute music-frequency exposure modulates salivary stress and neurotrophic markers in young adults. Brain Behav 2026. doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71452 Abstract only
- [15] Wunderlin M, Züst MA, Hertenstein E, et al. Modulating overnight memory consolidation by acoustic stimulation during slow-wave sleep. Sleep 2021. doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa296 Abstract only
- [16] Basner M, Smith MG, Cordoza M, et al. Efficacy of pink noise and earplugs for mitigating the effects of intermittent environmental noise exposure on sleep. Sleep 2026;49(5):zsag001. doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag001 Read in full
- [17] Zavecz Z, Nagy T, Galkó A, Nemeth D, Janacsek K. The relationship between subjective sleep quality and cognitive performance in healthy young adults. Sci Rep 2020. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61627-6 Abstract only
- [18] Venkatesan T, Demetriou AM, Hempel A, Bowling DL. A scoping review of music-based digital therapeutics for stress, anxiety, and depression. Front Hum Neurosci 2026. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1602004 Abstract only
- [19] University press coverage of the Nigg review, with Nigg's comments, Medical Xpress, August 2024. medicalxpress.com/news/2024-08-white-pink-noise-focus-children.html Read the web page
- [20] Vasilev MR, Kirkby JA, Angele B. Auditory distraction during reading: a Bayesian meta-analysis of a continuing controversy. Perspect Psychol Sci 2018. doi.org/10.1177/1745691617747398 Read in full
- [21] Riedy SM, Smith MG, Rocha S, Basner M. Noise as a sleep aid: a systematic review. Sleep Med Rev 2021. doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101385 Abstract only
- [22] Barnett AG, van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol 2005. doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh299 Abstract only
- [23] WHO. Deafness and hearing loss: safe listening (Q&A). www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/deafness-and-hearing-loss-safe-listening Read the web page
- [24] Hugh SC, Wolter NE, Propst EJ, et al. Infant sleep machines and hazardous sound pressure levels. Pediatrics 2014. doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3617 Abstract only
- [25] Epilepsy Society. Photosensitive epilepsy. www.epilepsysociety.org.uk/about-epilepsy/epileptic-seizures/seizure-triggers/photosensitive-epilepsy Read the web page
- [26] W3C. Understanding Success Criterion 2.3.1: Three Flashes or Below Threshold. www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/three-flashes-or-below-threshold.html Read the web page